Skip to content
Gold 24K / tola402,341Dollar (market)276.78Dollar open market280Petrol / litre377.91
zaviya
Trending#1Islamabad#2Karachi#3Lahore#4Khyber Pakhtunkhwa#5Pakistan#6National Assembly#7Shehbaz Sharif#8Gold rate#9Namaz timings#10Dollar rate#11Baby names#12Petrol price
Breaking

FCC confirms NIRC can remand trade union cases under law

A two-judge bench held that sending a trade-union constitution dispute back for a fresh hearing falls within the Full Bench’s incidental appellate powers under the 2012 industrial relations law.

Zaviya Desk

· 4 min read

WhatsApp
Zaviya

FCC backs remand power of labour appeal bench

The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), Pakistan’s specialised constitutional court, has held that the Full Bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC) — the statutory labour relations forum — may send a case back for a fresh decision when it hears an appeal under Section 58 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. A two-judge FCC bench said a direction for fresh adjudication is not an unlawful stretch of the Full Bench’s powers.

The court found that the contested remand order was tied to appellate jurisdiction already granted by statute, and that nothing in it showed a jurisdictional flaw that required the FCC to intervene.

How the NBP union dispute reached the courts

The case grew from a fight inside the NBP Workers Welfare Union (Punjab-Islamabad CBU). The union’s secretary general sought changes to Articles 1 and 11 of the union constitution. The Registrar of Trade Unions approved those amendments on 19 December 2023.

Members of an opposing group challenged that approval before the NIRC. On 1 July 2024 the appellate order set aside the registrar’s approval and remitted the matter for a fresh decision after giving all concerned stakeholders a chance to be heard. The petitioner then took the NIRC order to the Islamabad High Court (IHC), relying mainly on Section 58(2)(a) of the 2012 Act. The IHC dismissed those petitions on 6 May 2026.

Before the FCC, the petitioner argued that because the statute does not expressly authorise remand, the NIRC Full Bench had stepped outside its legal remit and the appellate order lacked lawful authority.

Why the court said remand is allowed

The FCC said that when the law confers appellate jurisdiction, it also carries the incidental powers reasonably needed to make that jurisdiction work, unless the statute clearly rules them out. Quoting a long-standing legal maxim, the judgment stressed that a grant of power includes what is indispensable to exercise it. The authority to set aside, vary or modify an order may therefore include remand where procedure or fact-finding was incomplete and the original forum must reconsider the matter.

Absence of an express remand clause, the court said, does not by itself cancel that incidental power, so long as the step remains ancillary to Section 58 and fits the scheme of the Act. The Full Bench had set aside the 19 December 2023 order and sent the proposed constitution amendments back for fresh adjudication with an effective hearing for all sides. It had not decided the rival claims on the merits or fixed the parties’ substantive rights.

The FCC described the remand as remedial: meant to fix procedural gaps and uphold audi alteram partem — the rule that the other side must be heard. Treating such a direction as beyond jurisdiction merely because the Act is silent on remand would, the court said, weaken appellate remedies and elevate technicalities over fair process.

What the FCC left to the specialised forum

The judgment noted that the dispute raises contested questions about the union’s elections, membership, constitutional amendments and rival claims to office. Those issues need a review of the record and, where needed, evidence — work that belongs first with the specialised statutory forum. Constitutional jurisdiction, the FCC observed, is supervisory rather than a full appeal, and is not ordinarily meant for a fresh determination of disputed facts while that forum remains seized of the case.

Timeline: what has happened so far

  • 19 December 2023: The Registrar of Trade Unions approves proposed amendments to Articles 1 and 11 of the NBP Workers Welfare Union (Punjab-Islamabad CBU) constitution.
  • 1 July 2024: The NIRC allows an appeal by opposing members, sets aside the approval, and remands the matter for a fresh decision after hearing all stakeholders.
  • 6 May 2026: The Islamabad High Court dismisses petitions challenging the NIRC appellate order.
  • Thereafter: The Federal Constitutional Court upholds the NIRC Full Bench’s power to remand and finds no jurisdictional infirmity in the remand order.

Aasan alfaaz mein

Federal Constitutional Court ne kaha hai ke NIRC ka Full Bench appeal mein case dubara sunwai ke liye wapas bhej sakta hai. Yeh mamla NBP Workers Welfare Union ke constitution ke amendments ka hai. Pehle approval set aside ho chuka hai, ab dono sides ko sunne ke baad naya faisla hoga. Union ke elections aur membership jaisay sawalat specialised labour forum hi dekhega.

Questions readers ask

FAQ

It held that under Section 58 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, the NIRC Full Bench may remand a matter for a fresh decision, and that such a direction is within its incidental appellate powers.

#Federal Constitutional Court#NIRC#NBP Workers Welfare Union#Islamabad High Court#Industrial Relations Act 2012#Registrar of Trade Unions#Islamabad
Share this story
WhatsApp
Web stories →

Add Zaviya News as a preferred source on Google

Google par Zaviya ko apna pasandeeda source banayein.

Add on Google

Read next

More from Pakistan

See all
Share on WhatsApp